Your are in AsianWeek Archives: Click Here for Main Home Page
AsianWeek.com
AsianWeek Home
This Weeks Feature
National and World News Section
Bay and California News Section
Business Section
Arts and Entertainment Section
Opinion Section
Arts and Entertainment Calendar
Discussion Board
Archives
Media Kit
Contact Us

Click for our latest cover

Buy our
Year of the Snake
poster!
July 13 - 19, 2001

Against the Clock: Immigrant welfare recipients face looming time limit
(in National News)

District 3 Dollars: Supervisor unveils allocations in new S.F. city budget
(in Bay Area News)

H-1B Workers Face Uncertain Future
(in Business)

The Vertical Ray of the Sun Reaches for New Heigts
(in A&E)

Lead Editorial: Do you know where Visitacion Valley is?
(in Opinion)

Baumhammer’s Parents to Be Held Accountable

Judge combines civil lawsuits of victims in shooting rampage

By Associated Press

An Allegheny County judge folded together four civil lawsuits against the parents of convicted killer Richard Baumhammers on July 5 and ordered defense attorneys to “bring their checkbook” for an Aug. 22 conference to settle the claims.

But Judge Eugene Strassburger also told attorneys for families of victims in the two-county shooting spree last year to “bring a willingness to accept less than the sun, moon and stars.”

Lawsuits filed by the families of five victims and the sole survivor of the shootings claim Andrejs and Inese Baumhammers knew their 35-year-old son was mentally ill, knew he had a weapon, and did nothing to prevent the shooting spree.

Judge Eugene Strassburger said he would first rule on a motion by two insurance companies with policies owned by the Baumhammers, who argue they are not liable in the lawsuit.

Andrejs Baumhammers had a personal umbrella policy with United Services Automobile Association with a limit of $5 million “per occurrence.”

The Baumhammers were also covered under a comprehensive personal policy for $300,000 by the Donegal Mutual Insurance Co.

Attorneys for the insurance companies argue that they cover accidents that result in bodily harm. They say Baumhammers’ shooting rampage was a deliberate act.

Depending on how the court rules, the Baumhammers could pay damages for each of the six people killed or wounded in the shootings — up to $36 million — or up to $5 million if the incident is ruled a singular action.

Sandip Patel, 26, had traveled from India to visit his family in the Pittsburgh area when he was shot by Baumhammers in the Patel family’s grocery. He is now paralyzed from the neck down.

“I wanted to help support my parents — now I cannot do that,” Patel said during Baumhammers’ murder trial. “I wanted to do so many things in my life and now I cannot do them. People have to do things for me.”

Baumhammers became the 241st person on Pennsylvania’s death row after an Allegheny County jury passed down a death sentence in May.

On April 28, 2000, Baumhammers fatally shot his Jewish neighbor, Anita Gordon, before driving to a grocery store in nearby Scott Township, fatally shooting Anil Thakur, an Indian man, and paralyzing Patel, who is also of Indian descent.

He then drove to a Chinese restaurant in Robinson Township, where he shot and killed Ji-Ye Sun, a native of China, and Thao Pham, who left Vietnam in 1979. He drove into Beaver County and shot Garry Lee, who was black, before being stopped by police.

Prosecutors said Baumhammers killed the victims because of their ethnic backgrounds.

Court documents and testimony during Baumhammers’ trial indicated a long history of associations with racist and anti-Semitic groups.

An attorney for Bonnie Ngo, Pham’s wife, said they have until next April to file a lawsuit.

No lawsuit has been filed on behalf of Thakur, whose nearest relatives live in India.


Top of This Page
National News Section
AsianWeek Home

Feature | National | Bay Area | Business | Arts & Entertainment | Opinion

©2001 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material.