1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary-content




Native American Tribes and Intuit Target Chiang

By: Maeley Tom, Nov 03, 2006
Tags: Capitol Watch |

Six Southern California Native American tribal casino owners and software company Intuit have put together millions of dollars to orchestrate a campaign to defeat John Chiang for State Controller.

The six tribes are upset because the democratic leadership of the Assembly did not approve a bill that would increase their gambling operations. So the tribes, through an independent expenditure committee called Team 2006, have decided to support specific republican state constitutional officer candidates in retaliation. John Chiang has been selected as one of the targets, even though Chiang had no involvement with this legislative issue whatsoever.

Software giant Intuit is spending $1 million to defeat Chiang for a purely self-serving economic reason. Chiang supports "ReadyReturn," a free and easy online tax filing through pre-filled returns for single, low-income Californians. Intuit was successful in killing the "ReadyReturn" pilot program in the Legislature. According to the Los Angeles Times, "The program alarms Intuit. If it were to be fully implemented, ReadyReturn could threaten sales of one of the company’s most successful software programs: TurboTax."

It is even more disheartening that these stealth groups in one day can outspend what candidates themselves raise in an entire campaign.

The dastardly agenda of the Team 2006 tribes and Intuit is disappointing. As Assembly Member Judy Chu states: "If they want to punish state legislators who did not vote for their bill, that would be one thing. But demonstrating their political muscle by trying to defeat an outstanding candidate like John Chiang is just plain unfair."

John Chiang is already the highest-ranking Asian statewide-elected official, and the only candidate with a background in finance and tax policy. He has won practically every major newspaper endorsement, 29-2 at the last count. The endorsements universally point to Chiang’s far superior fiscal experience and touts his leadership skills in using bipartisan approaches to solve issues.

"It is truly remarkable that one special interest group could decide the outcome of an important state election because of an issue that has nothing to do with the candidates or the office involved," says Chiang who is fighting back in the media and up and down the state.

I believe Team 2006 seriously underestimated how significant John Chiang’s candidacy is to both the democrats and republicans of this community, the second fastest-growing population group and voter bloc in California. There is already evidence that this political move against Chiang has raised his profile in a positive way, and is causing a negative backlash for special interest groups involved.

The Team 2006 tribes have squandered years of relationship building with a strong ally. This community has an expansive memory and is tired of being considered "easy pickings." Let’s see how this community responds to these six tribes when they need public support or the help of legislators who represent a large number of APA constituents in their district the next time around.

Please vote Nov. 7!


Statewide APA Angry Reaction to Chiang’s challengers: National political guru Garry South’s Oct. 25 article in the California Majority Report website was the first to blast Team 2006 on behalf of Chiang and the APA community.
Reeling from the blatant, ill motive last-minute efforts to take out our community’s best-qualified statewide candidate for constitutional office, many APA leaders feel angry and betrayed. Why not? After all the majority of APA voters helped these very same tribes in passing Prop. 5 in 1998 to allow them to establish their casinos. Every casino today depends on a large number of APA patrons to contribute to their economic success. And yet this is how these tribes pay our community back for our support.


APA political clout can have the last word

It is important to remember that these six tribes identified below are only a subgroup of the California tribal casino owners. Other major groups such as the California Tribal Business Alliance have been steadfast supporters of Chiang’s candidacy.

Team 2006 Tribes attacking John Chiang:

San Manuel Band of Mission Indians

26569 Community Center Drive

Highland, CA 92346

Ph: (909) 864-8933

Fax: (909) 864-3370

Chairman Henry Duro

Vice Chairman Vince Duro

Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians

P.O. Box 1477

Temecula, CA 92593

Ph: (951) 694-1508

Tribal Chairman Mark A. Macarro (TV spokesman for Prop. 5)

Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians

23904 Soboba Road

P.O. Box 487

San Jacinto, CA 92581

Ph: (909) 654-2765

Fax: (909) 654-4198

Chairman Robert Salgado Sr.

Sycuan Band of Kumeyaay Indians

5459 Sycuan Road

El Cajon, CA 92019

Ph: (619) 445-2613

Fax: (619) 445-1927

Chairman Daniel J. Tucker

Vice Chairman Joseph Sandoval

Santa Ynez Band of Mission Indians

P.O. Box 517

Santa Ynez, CA 93460

Ph: (805) 688-7997

Fax: (805) 686-9578

Chairman Vincent Armenta

Vice Chairman Richard Gomez

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians

600 E. Tahquitz Canyon

Palm Springs, CA 92262

Ph: (760) 325-3400

Fax: (760) 325-0593

Chairman Richard M. Milanovich

Vice Chairman Barbara Gonzales Lyons

 

Comments

Post your comments.

Comments using inappropriate language will not be posted. AsianWeek reserves the right to re-publish comments, into "Letters to the Editor," in which case, we reserve the right to edit comments for length and style. If you would like to write a letter to our editor, please email: asianweek@asianweek.com.


© 2005-2008 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. Privacy Policy

Close
E-mail It