SAN FRANCISCO — A proposed Chinatown community college campus won a major victory as College Board members supported two two-building plans after a seven-hour, standing room only marathon meeting that lasted until 1:30 a.m. last Friday.
By a 6-to-1 vote, trustees supported two plans: 14-story and 4-story buildings, and 13-story and 5-story structures. The latter plan could depend on City College of San Francisco successfully renegotiating a legal settlement , with preservationists supporting the adjacent Columbo Building at Columbus and Washington streets. The settlement prohibits the shorter building from exceeding 85 feet. The taller building would stand at Kearny and Washington streets.
The two-building plans are compromises aimed to suit critics of the original proposal for a 16-story building.
Asian American trustees Lawrence Wong and Rodel Rodis, along with Natalie Berg, Anita Grier, Milton Marks and Julio Ramos, supported the amended resolution. John Rizzo, trying to broker a compromise, opposed the measure and argued that the district did not answer his questions about the environmental impact report and designs.
Two prior crucial votes cleared the path for the two plans – approval of the draft environmental impact report and exemption of the state-sponsored development from local planning codes. The exemption passed 7-0, while environmental impact report approval won 6-1, with trustee Milton Marks opposing. Marks complained it was “pretty offensive” that he was presented with the three resolutions three nights earlier, without room for trustee input or changes.
What looms ahead are legal challenges and $15 to 16 million more than the $122 million budgeted for a campus serving more than 6,000 mostly immigrant students, which is expected to open in 2010.
THE CHINATOWN CAMPUS DEBATE
“Thank the Hilton Hotel … to really put a fire under the hearts and minds of my community. … The icons of the Chinese American, Filipino American community – they are all in this room. … In the history of the Chinese American community, this is a revolution.”
— Lawrence Wong, college trustee
“I hope that when you go through the implementation phase, that by going a floor lower you save $3 or $4 million. … The Hilton was not the cause of this 30-year delay. … We didn’t buy a lot that had … contaminants on it. We didn’t put out a plan in 2003 that went nowhere. … This and other reasons are why there are cost overruns.”
— Michael Yaki, attorney representing the Hilton Hotel
“I support the decision of the elected college trustees. … I am committed to securing state funds to ensure the campus is built on time and on budget.”
— Assemblywoman Fiona Ma
“Look at this [Filbert Street campus]. Is this worth $500,000 per year? That’s how much we’re paying the Unified School District [for a building] that’s crumbling all over the place, that’s substandard.”
— Rodel Rodis, trustee
“There are real concerns … about expansion of downtown into communities [like Chinatown], with primarily low to mid-rise communities. … The EIR is lacking in recognition of serious land-use impacts.”
— Milton Marks III, trustee
“Several people have kept coming up here complaining about the meeting location and [that it is] small … uncomfortable. If these people cannot tolerate this building, what do you think our students feel like every day of the week?”
— Natalie Berg, trustee
“We’re probably going to litigate this issue. [But] I believe the district will win [in the public interest].”
— Julio Ramos, trustee