1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary-content




Calling All Candidates

By: Phil Tajitsu Nash, Dec 17, 2007
Tags: Washington Journal |

On Dec. 11, Warren Furutani finished first in a special election called to fill a vacated California Assembly seat for District 55 in Southern California near Los Angeles. If instant-runoff voting had been used for the vote counting, he would be serving his constituents today. Instead, because he got only 49.2 percent of the vote in a five-way race, the Lakewood-based Democrat heads to a Feb. 5 runoff against two third-party candidates. Given the now-unified support of the Democratic Party, he is virtually assured of victory on Feb. 5.

Warren’s victory is the culmination of decades of community service by a man who has helped to shape the APA movement since the late 1960s, and raises expectations that the already-strong APA caucus in the state Legislature will have even more clout in the years ahead. Aside from serving as a trustee of the local Community College District and member of the Los Angeles Board of Education (both immense organizations, given the size of Los Angeles), Warren has served as an adviser to several of the most powerful officials in Los Angeles and the state of California. Once seated in the Assembly, he is well-positioned to get a leadership post and do even more for his constituents and the APA community.

While Warren works hard and deserves this honor, what does it mean for the rest of us who may aspire to elective office? If we do not have the powerful speaking and writing skills, years of experience and overflowing address book of a Warren Furutani, is elective office a realistic possibility?

The answer is definitely yes, and I encourage everyone reading this article to consider running for office, or pass this to someone who needs a little nudge to let them know they are not being arrogant or immodest by thinking that they, too, can aspire to elective office.

Here are three important lessons for potential APA candidates that flow from observing Warren’s rise in the political world:

1. Start with who you are. As a fourth-generation Japanese American, Warren Furutani has always had a strong sense of being an American of Japanese ancestry. He has worked for Japanese American groups and helped start the Manzanar Pilgrimage, which took the community back to the site of their wartime incarceration to vaccinate us against a recurrence. Yet, he also has been a singer, writer, speaker and organizer for the educational opportunity for all Americans, especially the poor, immigrants, and others relegated to the margins of the education system.

Instead of looking at his resume and saying, “Gee, I am not a lawyer or accountant, so I cannot run for office,” Warren had the self-confidence to know that an intelligent, resourceful, hardworking person can master almost anything. Through years of service, he has learned how to read balance sheets, conduct personnel hearings, and perform other jobs required by the offices he has held.

2. Start small and build from there.
Warren Furutani and most of the rest of us do not have obscene amounts of money to buy our way into electoral victories. Instead, Warren called on the friends he had developed over many years of community organizing when he ran for his first school board seat. After that, he did well enough to be elected board president, and then found he had enough political visibility that his career took on its own upward trajectory.

Other prospective APA candidates should see if there are community service groups or an appointive position such as library board or PTA board that can be used to build a resume of service in the community. Then, when you run for office, you already will have name recognition and allies.

3. Don’t be afraid to fail. Both by cultural predisposition and because of our minority status in this country, APAs hate to fail. Losing in public is considered such a humiliation that many of us play it safe by serving on the staff of someone else’s campaign, when we ourselves could do equally as well as those candidates.

Warren is an example of someone who lost his previous attempt to win this Assembly position, but came back again to win. Many other politicians, including Bill Clinton and George Bush, learned painful lessons in defeat before winning later elections.

In the end, however, the only real losers are those who never aspire to serve others. If that service includes serving as an elected official, take some time in 2008 to volunteer for a candidate or cause you believe in, and see if running for office is for you.

Comments

  1. The author tries fortune telling: ” If instant-runoff voting had been used for the vote counting, he would be serving his constituents today,”

    No one can predict the impact of IRV on voting, elections and voters.

    All we CAN know for certain is that in San Francisco, the largest IRV jurisdiction in the US:
    voter turnout is way down since implementation of IRV,
    number of registered voters is down,
    there were no serious candidates running against millionaire playboy mayor Newsome, but there were alot of candidates,
    many voters didn’t bother to rank three choices,
    some said they didn’t want to vote for a second choice, they wanted their first choice,
    ballot paper was wasted - with one page for the dozen running against Newsome, and one page for the uncontested DA race (1 candidate) and the Sheriff’s office with only 2 candidates (but rank your 3 choices anyway)

    Jay Bordeleau, an election inspector at Notre Dame Des Victoires in Union Square concurred.

    “I was confused looking at the ballot in San Francisco and I imagine a lot of voters would be too.”

    “There are a lot of people who only mark one [candidate] or the same person three times,” he said.

    While San Francisco voters have used RCV before, confusion remains. “People get confused when their ballot comes back, [they ask] ‘what do I do?’” Bordeleau said.

    http://www.electionline.org/Newsletters/tabid/87/ctl/Detail/mid/643/xmid/278/xmfid/3/Default.aspx

    and even after an expensive voting education program for 3 years, and even with printing the instructions on the ballot, some voters still mistakenly marked the same candidate for all three choices, thus rendering the 2nd and 3rd choices invalid.

    IRV has a fatal flaw - it is “non monotonic” in that you can hurt your preferred candidate by voting for them.

    Some ballots are worth more than others - voters who aren’t news junkies will have more trouble ranking a 2nd and 3rd choice.

    Incumbents should just LOVE IRV because of the enormous advantage it gives them.

    –Joyce McCloy on Dec 17, 2007

  2. Approval Voting is a simpler, cheaper, and better alternative to Instant Runoff Voting, and allows us to use our standard ballots and voting machines. We just take off the 1-candidate limit. You may vote for one _or more_ candidates. Vote splitting and runoffs eliminated. Easy as pie.

    –Clay Shentrup on Dec 17, 2007

  3. Phil, really enjoyed reading this piece. Good advice all around and also a good case study on Warren’s road to the Assembly.

    –Keith Kamisugi on Dec 17, 2007

  4. Dear Joyce, Clay and Keith,

    Thanks for your feedback. I’m short on time today, so will reply to all in one message:

    1. Joyce is concerned that incumbents get power to get re-elected that is unfair to other candidates. I am as well. IRV, however, is not the problem in SF (or anywhere else) in this regard.

    IRV cannot create competition where it does not exist. It can, however, stop the suppression of competition that we currently see in our two-party winner-take-all form of politics. If Gavin Newsom is cruising to re-election, it may be because he is doing a good job, or has a lot of money, or is politically well connected. But opponents have to mobilize themselves in order to take advantage of IRV, just like in all vote-counting systems.

    2. Joyce is also worried that IRV is not rational. However, it is rational enough that Robert’s Rules of Order recommends the use of IRV when elections are held in one round via mail. Typing “IRV” into your browser brings up plenty of information on Wikipedia and other sites that explain how it works. See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

    3. The voting problems Joyce ascribes to IRV’s tenure in SF are problems we see in many jurisdictions, so it is a little unfair to place the blame on IRV. Also, you can use one example of someone who was confused about a ballot, but San Francisco’s elections using Ranked Choice Voting (RCV, a type of Instant Runoff Voting, or IRV) have produced results that are 99.6% valid. In technical jargon, the rate of overvotes using IRV has been 0.4%. In other places where IRV has been tried, similarly excellent results have been achieved. For example, Burlington, Vermont had a rate of 99.9% valid ballots when IRV was first tried.

    4. Clay favors approval voting, which is superior to the current winner-take-all form of elections we now see in most places. However, the reason that IRV is used in many countries, corporations, and universities (and approval voting is not used anywhere that I know of) is that IRV is better than approval voting in several respects. No system is perfect, mind you, but the simplicity of approval voting is outweighed, in my opinion, by three disadvantages.

    First, approval voting (vote for all candidates you approve of, and the one with the most votes wins) could lead to the defeat of a candidate that was supported by the majority of voters. Second, there is no way to weigh your vote, and most of us have stronger preferences for one candidate than another. Finally, approval voting is likely to revert back to plain old plurality (winner-take-all) voting when campaigns urge their supporters to bullet vote only for their one preferred candidate; otherwise, voting for a second candidate can lead to the defeat of your favorite candidate (sometimes called a spoiler effect).

    5. Thanks, Keith, for your note about Warren Furutani’s road to victory. He is a fascinating case study of how to work both inside and outside the system to advance a public interest agenda.

    Thank you all for writing. Have a good holiday season!

    Phil

    –Phil Nash on Dec 18, 2007

Post your comments.

Comments using inappropriate language will not be posted. AsianWeek reserves the right to re-publish comments, into "Letters to the Editor," in which case, we reserve the right to edit comments for length and style. If you would like to write a letter to our editor, please email: asianweek@asianweek.com.


© 2005-2008 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. Privacy Policy

Close
E-mail It