This week, I’ve discovered the new “twofer,” the two-for-one combo that covers all the bases when some heretofore racist/colorless institution tries to look more appealing in our era of diversity.
The combo that is all the rage is no longer race and sex. It’s race and age, as indicated by the scuttlebutt on Louisiana Gov. Piyush “Bobby” Jindal as a possible running mate for John McCain. Uncle Bobby? Yup.
And the talk is likely to get louder, considering the momentum shift in the Democratic dogfight to Obama.
After this week’s primaries in Indiana and North Carolina, you won’t see Hillary Clinton’s departure. She’s too close to leave now. It’s like a troubled marriage. You stay for the kids and hope for the best.
Her problem is, she doesn’t have the kids on her side. She has seniors, according to exit polls, people who remember how things were (or have at least a political memory of better times). They’re people who like the new, just not the “too new.”
The age split is like your office passing up the veteran and putting the young kid in charge. You’ve seen it happen at work. It may have happened to you. It looks like it’s happening in the presidential race.
Asian Americans know how the generational divide works all too well in the Clinton/Obama fight. The young and young-at- heart go Obama. The mature have undying loyalties to Clinton. It’s these voters that give the overwhelming edge among APAs to Clinton.
If you’re a Clinton supporter this week, I imagine you must feel like Sen. Daniel Inouye did after the Hawaii primary. You keep a stiff upper lip and say, “Let democracy play out.”
But this could be a unique opportunity for APA politicos. For Asian Americans, it’s never been “either/or” when it comes to Obama/Clinton. It’s mostly been “both/and” with perhaps a slight bias one way or the other.
As no one takes seriously the idea of an Obama/Clinton ticket, it may be time for some key Asian Americans to take a leadership role in blazing the path in the name of party unity. A weakened nominee shouldn’t end up the consequence of having two strong candidates in the warm-up.
Perhaps our agreeable nature is the best thing for the Democrats to fashion an end game that makes sense for all. Our community’s political godfather, Norm Mineta, served as a cabinet member for both Clinton and Bush. And he was out in front practically from day one for Obama.
An Obama Choice Makes Mccain-Jindal a Greater Possibility
The McCain camp is discussing Jindal’s veep potential, according to The New York Times columnist Guillermo Kristol (he says William, but he’s really a Guillermo). Apparently, the McCain camp is thinking ahead to an Obama nomination and how to combat it. Kristol reported how at least four people close to McCain are pushing Jindal as the “change agent” antidote to counter Obama. Jindal is seen as the guy who gives a clear alternative to “change voters” skittish about an Obama-in-chief, and who gives a ticket led by an aging white guy broader appeal.
Of course, the GOP had the same designs for a youthful Dan Quayle. So, is Jindal this generation’s Quayle? Maybe.
With Jindal, McCain gets the entire South — including South Asia. You get an overachieving, elite Ivy League, Rhodes scholar who is also a young Christian super-patriot who believes in “intelligent design.” You cover all the bases, and you cover your base.
Jindal is the perfect right-wing, young person of color to put up against another elitist, young person of color from the Democratic side.
He also buttresses the stereotype of Asian Americans as the go-to tool for conservative causes. Who does the right use to challenge affirmative action? Chinese Americans. Conservatives also have long used Asian Americans to justify right-wing positions, from Dinesh D’Souza’s writings against race preferences, to Michelle Malkin and to the more current John Yoo, the torture rationalist. They are the GOP’s “Model Minority.”
My complaint with Jindal has been expressed before. I call him a “man without color,” one who aspires to being totally colorless. With Jindal, you get someone who very deliberately and proudly downplays his race in order to seek his own individual path.
In his acceptance speech last year after winning the governor’s race, Jindal barely mentioned his Punjab heritage. That kind of independence under certain circumstances may be commendable, but only if you happen to agree with his ideas that range from free-market health care to anti-choice and a fenced-in America. As I’ve said, when did Newt Gingrich die and reincarnate?
To me, Obama is the good side of color-blind, compared to Jindal, who takes the Ward Connerly view of that. But here’s the difference: When Obama looks past the pigment, he generally gets the substance part right.
That’s where I’m color-blind. I won’t just vote blindly for a person of color. The substance still counts for me.
For more on Jindal and Obama: amok.asianweek.com
E-mail:emil@amok.com