1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary-content




District 3 Candidates For Supervisor Debate

By: Leila Kang, Jun 27, 2008
Tags: Bay Area |

SAN FRANCISCO — Ten of the 11 candidates for District 3 supervisor met for a town hall debate sponsored by the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association at the Holiday Inn Golden Gateway in lower Nob Hill on June 16.

The community board of the district — encompassing Chinatown, North Beach, Polk Gulch, Nob and Russian Hills, the Financial District and Fisherman’s Wharf — asked the candidates about the issues affecting the area, which is one of the most densely populated Asian Pacific American neighborhoods with approximately 31,957 Asian Pacific American residents comprising 49 percent of its residents.

All the candidates addressed the problem of homelessness in the area. According to the city’s most recent homeless report in January 2007, District 3’s homeless population has consistently been high, although not as high as District 6 (Tenderloin/SoMa/ Civic Center). District 3 had 206 homeless people at the time of the count, while District 6 had 1,239 homeless people.

David Chiu, a former assistant district attorney and one of the members of Founding Leadership Team in the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association, said that the community and city cannot provide programs without accountability. “I am supportive of affordable housing,” Chiu said.

Claudine Cheng, a director on the board of the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, said the city must work alongside residents and the district to combat the problem of homelessness.

Wilma Pang, a Chinatown community activist, proposed that the community, including herself, speak with the homeless in order to better understand their needs.

Joseph Alioto Jr. suggested increasing police presence on the streets. “I am a big supporter of increasing the police force, adding 150 more police in the budget,” Alioto said.

Another trend in the district is the decline of small businesses, which are being hit by a mix of high overhead costs, taxes and lower amounts of foot traffic.

“I want to see that regulations are squarely applied and policies are reviewed,” Cheng said.

Chiu promised to help “city contracts get back to San Francisco” and said he sees potential in diversifying business.

Pang proposed looking into tourism “to strengthen small business.” Tourism brought in an estimated $8.2 billion citywide in 2007.

When asked about strategies to fight crime, all three APA candidates strongly endorsed using law enforcement, though Chiu also supports a reform to police station locations. They also support a collaboration between law enforcement and the community to reduce crime.

“The community needs to work with the police department and conduct a series of meetings on how the residents can solve it,” Pang said.

Related articles:
The Importance of Role Models

Comments

  1. Joseph Alioto was clearly the most prepared out of any candidate.

    Although I have never met him, David Chiu seemed very cold. It also is very disconcerting to me that David Chiu is supported by Supervisor Chris Daly and that he does not support the Community Justice Center as well as the JROTC. Surely not the best representative of the Chinese community!!!

    –Johnny Utah on Jun 27, 2008

  2. Johnny,

    Get your facts straight before spreading misinformation.

    David Chiu supports the Community Justice Center.

    I attend the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association forum and David Chiu was articulate, reasoned, and friendly.

    He’s supported by Daly, but he’s also strongly supported by Assessor-Recorder Phil Ting, Newsom’s education advisor and School Board Commissioner Hydra Mendoza, District Attorney Kamala Harris, and Public Defender Jeff Adachi, among many other citywide and neighborhood leaders.

    Can Alioto or any other candidate demonstrate the same level of broad-based, political and community support from such diverse interests?

    These individuals likely don’t support David Chiu because he agrees with them 100% of the time.

    They support him because he’s demonstrated, whether as an affordable housing or civil rights advocate, the ability to move beyond personality and try to find common ground to address challenging problems.

    And please don’t speak for the Chinese community with an absurd statement like “Surely not the best representative of the Chinese community!!!” as if the Chinese community in SF is some monolithic population.

    The Chinese community is as diverse as San Francisco – a mix of tenants and homeowners, political progressives, moderates, and conservatives, and small business owners and union members.

    Your generalization alone about the “Chinese community” already speaks volumes about your lack of understanding of District 3.

    –Dan on Jun 27, 2008

  3. Hey, Johnny Utah, I bet you weren’t even there at the debate…

    –d3fan on Jun 27, 2008

  4. At the debate David Chiu specifically said he did not support the Community Justice Center.

    Would you like to see the video?

    –Johnny Utah on Jun 27, 2008

  5. I think Chiu’s position on the CJC changes depending on who he is talking to… this is how Chiu effectively represents such “diverse” interests.

    Very similar to his endorsement of both Lennar’s Prop G and Daly’s Prop F. Now that is some serious broad based support!!!

    –GiGi on Jun 27, 2008

  6. Johnny - I’d like to see the video. Post the video and comment with the URL to it.

    –Keith on Jun 27, 2008

  7. Most damaging revelation was that the company that David Chiu founded and operates, Grassroot Enterprises, has hired a Christian Coalition dirty tricks politician by the name of Randy Tate on its board of directors. If Chiu was an ethical person why would he hire such a person?

    –MarcB on Jun 27, 2008

  8. why no coverage on the rest of the candidates?

    –Sam Kwong on Jun 27, 2008

  9. Johnny,

    You once again have proven to me or anyone else who attended the debate that you’re a liar out to smear another candidate. Why don’t you focus on positives, like why you support one candidate, instead of simply spreading lies?

    I attended the debate and there was no discussion on the Community Justice Center asking the candidates to take a position. You’re misrepresenting a candidate’s position.

    Davd Chiu has said that he supports the Community Justice Center. Period.

    He’s a former criminal prosecutor and community court Judge-Arbitrator who has worked hard to improve public safety in his neighborhood and citywide.

    Post your video on YouTube or another public forum if you’d like to prove me wrong.

    While you’re sitting in the comforts of your room reviewing your video tape, David Chiu is out doing what he’s been doing all his adult life - fighting for the least fortunate, improving his neighborhood, and championing issues people care about like better public transit, affordable housing, universal health care, immigrant rights.

    –Dan on Jun 27, 2008

  10. Good point. This outlet is clearly focused on Candidates with Asian surnames. I suppose Alito was thrown in to give the appearance of balanced coverage of an event that took place 11 days ago. Not exactly hot off the press news.

    Clearly Chiu’s early endorsement from Chris Daly means that Daly has already sized Chiu up and thinks he is of like minded politics. Is that supposed to be a favorable selling point for Chiu?

    –MarcB on Jun 27, 2008

  11. MarcB = wrong.

    David Chiu did not hire Randy Tate to be on the company’s board of directors.

    –Keith on Jun 27, 2008

  12. Reread my comments Keith. I didn’t write that Chiu hired Tate. I wrote that the company that Chiu founded hired Randy Tate. If Chiu is a Grassroots Enterprises founder as he claims to be he should/would have had influence in who the company hires. Isn’t that correct? Hiring this Christian Coalition creep is something Chiu should/could have prevented so RandyTate’s employment is on David Chiu. I’m not inclined to hire or allow the hiring of NRA promoting anti-gay Christian Coalition bigots for my company. Are you?

    –MarcB on Jun 27, 2008

  13. MarcB = wrong (again)

    MarcB: “If Chiu was an ethical person why would he hire such a person?”

    From what I understand, David is a minority owner in Grassroots and does not have final say over hiring decisions.

    And do you really want to call me out about the organization I work for, MarcB?

    You are party to the kind of political bickering that the people of San Francisco of tired of.

    –Keith on Jun 27, 2008

  14. MarcB wrote: “If Chiu was an ethical person why would he hire such a person?”

    MarcB then wrote: “Reread my comments Keith. I didn’t write that Chiu hired Tate.”

    I followed MarcB’s advice and re-read his comments and can only conclude that…

    MarcB is so full of crap that he can’t even keep up with his own inane arguments.

    –MarcB's Mom on Jun 28, 2008

  15. In lieu of a valid explanation about Mr Chiu’s apparent ethical lapse it is you who has resorted to name calling in the face of my right to exercise free speech. You first incorrectly rephrased my initial statement and then being called on your word shuffling ruse you then took the less adroit tack to suggest that I should remain silent.

    What do you mean by this odd statement? “And do you really want to call me out about the organization I work for, MarcB?”

    Is that supposed to be some kind of a threat? Or just weird? Are you speaking for yourself or do you speak on behalf of David Chiu in this regard?

    –MarcB on Jun 28, 2008

  16. marcb, take a breather. it’s just wrong to twist the position of a candidate. no one is infinging on your free speech. San Francisco is better served without half-truths, unfounded attacks and innuendo.

    –keith on Jun 28, 2008

  17. Johnny Utah – can you please name one thing Joseph Alioto Jr. has done for Chinatown or Asian Americans in District 3? I want to vote for him and I’m open to hear about his experiences. My fear is that Joseph Alioto Jr. is just another wealthy Alioto trading on an old family name, and simply out of step with Chinatown and District 3.

    –Chung on Jun 28, 2008

  18. CHIU=CHRIS DALY

    –Galvert on Jun 30, 2008

  19. The article and many of the online comments are completely in favor of one candidate. There were 10 candidates at the debate and only 4 are mentioned.

    Unfortunately many of today’s online political campaigns are shaped by astroturf organizations that coordinate online campaigns with fake grassroots organizations and discussion posts driven by people who have little or nothing to do with the cause they’re advocating other than getting paid. Astroturf organizations farm themselves out to the top paying dollar without regard to poltical position.

    Watch the posts on online discussion groups and blogs in regards to the District 3 candidates. Many of them are heavily biased in one direction but they often don’t seem to read like other posts from locals in the District.

    –Ernie on Jun 30, 2008

  20. DAVID CHIU = MARK LENO + PHIL TING + KAMALA HARRIS + JEFF ADACHI + TOM AMMIANO + MAJORITY OF SF SCHOOL BOARD +SF LABOR COUNCIL + HUNDREDS OF OTHER CITYWIDE AND DISTRICT 3 LEADERS

    Galvert, nice try highlighting one endorsement but the facts are clear that David Chiu has the broadest, most diverse list of endorsements out any of the District 3 candidates.

    An endorsement doesn’t mean 100% agreement on issues and style. An endorsement means the endorser believes the candidate has the character, integrity and skills to move San Francisco forward.

    And they’re basing their endorsements on a David Chiu’s 12-year track record of accomplishments, not just promises. In District 3 and citywide, many people agree the best candidate is David Chiu.

    –Dan on Jun 30, 2008

  21. whoa.
    And wow.
    Democracy at work?
    What this old perch found interesting was that Alioto is in favor of 150 more cops rousting 206? homeless.
    What, shoot them with 50 rounds?
    And only one of the four candidates mentioned suggested “talkling to” the miscrables who may also be miscreants.
    “Homelessness” today is rapidly expanding into those “living” in RVs on neighborhood streets, and even the “free” “Republic” of Digby’s Santa Monica is in the same league as District 3 AND South of Market?
    it’s Rand Corp. “thinktanking” to render human beings into numbers that can be “crunched” into the mainframes, whence issue solutions that are purely digital and numerical and almost never “human.”
    What I find saddest here is that even the term “grassroots” has now taken a new and antithetical meaning, forget “definition,” as in Webster’s.
    In today’s “grassroots” jungle of “politics,” one hasn’t a “Chinaman’s chance” of rooting out the “blades” from the Astroturf.
    Yeah, who’s paying whom? And what are the “stakes”? and to whom do they belong?
    Let’s find oot what Matier/Ross “think” and wait for the Chronicle’s “endorsement,” forget that “Examiner.”

    –Frank Eng on Jun 30, 2008

  22. “And do you really want to call me out about the organization I work for, MarcB?”

    David, is that you?!? Looks like you slipped! Which other names are you as well posting here….?

    –SFresident on Jul 03, 2008

  23. Those bashing David Chiu here seem to be poorly informed. Of course, some of the Alioto posts are difficult to interpret as well. My suggestion: meet the candidates and their supporters, visit their websites and get the facts.

    –Chris on Jul 07, 2008

  24. Johnny Utah, maybe the Forty-Niners could use you this season. If you are going to post with any integrity, people should at least use their real names to have any credibility.

    David Chiu, he’s all right let’s see how the campaign unfolds. Alioto Jr. suggests that he wants to see more police on the streets to stop homelessness. Can someone please tell me how more police on the streets are going to stop poverty, the prison industrial complex and starving stomachs? What are police supposed to do, beat the hell out of someone because they don’t have a place to live. Or maybe, he thinks we should continue to put more money into building jails in San Bruno and diverting it from the educational system.

    As for Chris Daly, nobody works harder for working-class families than he does. This is why he keeps on getting re-elected in his district that is quite the opposite of District 3. But if you want to talk about a living wage, affordable housing opportunities, developers paying their fair share, maintaining senior, youth and disability services, foot patrols, SFUSD accountability, budget matters that gave raises to police, fire and sheriff’s deputies and any other issues that face everyday San Franciscans, then let’s talk. The truth is Michela, much less Joe have been literally absent on these issues.

    Joe Alioto, I mean Johnny Utah, you dropped the ball.

    –Dioscoro R. Recio on Jul 08, 2008

  25. Hello everyone,

    I came across this article for the first time this evening and am glad to see that the race is prompting a vibrant discussion. Dioscoro, feel free to give me a call and we can discuss any of the issues you mentioned, or others, if you’d like. That invitation is, of course, open to all of you. My telephone number is (415) 248-2600. You may also visit my website at http://www.AliotoForSupervisor.com to learn more about me. I am updating it often.

    Finally, while I appreciate Mr. Utah’s kind remarks, you may rest assured that if I post something here, it will be under my own name.

    I hope to get the chance to meet you in person sometime soon.

    Joe Alioto, Jr.

    –Joseph Alioto, Jr. on Jul 16, 2008

  26. Of course Alioto is opposed to any solutions to homelessness other than hiring more police officers! His campaign is being financed by the Police Officers’ Union!
    We need someone in District 3 who represents residents of District 3, not city employees.

    –Emmett on Oct 04, 2008

Post your comments.

Comments using inappropriate language will not be posted. AsianWeek reserves the right to re-publish comments, into "Letters to the Editor," in which case, we reserve the right to edit comments for length and style. If you would like to write a letter to our editor, please email: asianweek@asianweek.com.


© 2005-2008 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. Privacy Policy

Close
E-mail It