1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to secondary-content




We Were Right — And Wrong

By: AsianWeek Staff, Jul 03, 2008
Tags: Lead Editorial, Opinion |

Two prominent Asian Pacific American players in post-9/11 policy and military strategy made encore appearances over the past two weeks — one in the spotlight and one in the background.

Former Justice Department attorney John Yoo, who wrote the 2002 and 2003 memos providing a legal basis for aggressive interrogation techniques of terror suspects, appeared on June 26 before a House Judiciary subcommittee investigating the role of Bush administration lawyers in approving interrogation procedures that were far harsher than those traditionally used by the U.S. military.

At the time, Yoo, a professor at the University of California-Berkeley, was regarded as a behind-the-scenes mastermind of Bush administration policy. But now, testifying before Congress and the cameras, he downplayed his role, denying involvement in interrogation-related policy decisions at the Justice Department and insisting that “my memo does not authorize anyone to torture anyone.”

Meanwhile, the Army released a report last weekend that seems to offer complete vindication for former Army Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki. In 2003, Shinseki — the highest-ranking APA in U.S. military history — was in the limelight and under heavy criticism himself when he testified before Congress that several hundred thousand more soldiers than planned by the Bush administration would be needed to win a war in Iraq. Soon after his testimony, he was forced into retirement.

Now the new Army report only references Shinseki’s position in the background, but rings a piercing I-told-you-so bell as the findings conclude that there was a massive underestimation of troops needed to stabilize a post-war Iraq.

Seven years after 9/11, we are still pointing fingers about who was right and who was wrong in the war on Iraq and the war on terrorism. As these two recent events illustrate, Asian Pacific Americans were both right and wrong. Moreover, as we are finding our places both behind-the-scenes and in the spotlight for determining policy and making history, we are also finding that it is not an easy or comfortable role.

On this Fourth of July, as we think back to America’s forefathers and how they constructed the foundations of our society, let us also think ahead to how we Asian Pacific Americans are shaping the future of this country — for better and for worse.

Comments

  1. What do you mean, “we?”

    This is not a good example to suggest or even infer that these decisions were made by committee of the Asian community. If Asians so much are in need to convince everyone that they are Americans, suggesting that these are monolithic decisions is wrong. Regardless of democratic principles and values, most Asians in America and those democratic countries in the Far East fully supported war for what ever reason, they were all wrong to support a war based on lies. Yoo and Shinseki were not polar opposites in regards to Iraq. They were both, in fact, for the war. Was Shinseki right? Would it have changed anything if all the troops he said were necessary were there in the first place in order to win? Yeah on paper, they should have pacified Iraq and turned it into a democracy in the first month of the war and oil would be cheaper per barrel below the twenty dollars it cost when Bush came into office as promised by Dick Cheney.

    –Jammer on Jul 03, 2008

  2. Guys:
    How about that other APA “general,” forgive my constant memory lapses, Taquba?
    Regardless, the point isn’t the “race” of the general, it’s whether the general swears allegiance to “the Republic” rather than the current “Caesar.”
    I was brought up to believe that the “military” “served”"us” and not the other way around.
    Chalmers Johnson said it years ago, in his writings AND “interviews,” that American military might is no different from all the others that preceded, with ALL the generals in it for their own personal patronage.
    Money, honey.
    Frank Eng
    P.S..: But as a sidebar, personally, I find academician John Yoo particularly abhorrent, someone who professes to “think” but who chooses to pimp and pander to power and wealth and station.

    –Frank Eng on Jul 04, 2008

Post your comments.

Comments using inappropriate language will not be posted. AsianWeek reserves the right to re-publish comments, into "Letters to the Editor," in which case, we reserve the right to edit comments for length and style. If you would like to write a letter to our editor, please email: asianweek@asianweek.com.


© 2005-2008 AsianWeek. The information you receive on-line from AsianWeek is protected by the copyright laws of the United States. The copyright laws prohibit any copying, redistributing, retransmitting, or repurposing of any copyright protected material. Privacy Policy

Close
E-mail It