An Olympic Perspective on Diversity
August 25, 2008
Obama has focused Americans on the conversation of diversity and excellence. We are a nation that carefully selects school superintendents, democratic convention delegates, while appointing public officials and hiring executives carefully to reflect the racial, ethnic and gender diversity of America. But the Olympics show us that all of our conventional wisdom about affirmative action and radical liberation are dead wrong.
Can we truly celebrate a winning basketball team of diverse talent when all of them are African Americans? Can a gymnastics team comprised completely of European American women be fair? In this age of Title IX and gender equity, why are Olympic athletics judged without regard to racial proportionality in outcomes? When we have committed to create standards where “all will succeed” without ranking people, why do we continue to specially recognize only the best 3 athletes?
*****Keeping up with Olympics:*****
2008 Beijing Olympics Meet Your Asian American Olympians!
AsianWeek’s Most Memorable Moments of the 2008 Beijing Olympics
****************************
Why did China, whose athletes are almost completely of one ethnic group, the Han Chinese, get the most gold medals, while Japan beat diverse America in women’s softball? Why were women relegated to softball instead of baseball? The United States clearly can credit the wealth of our economic system for winning the most medals, yet some of the fastest and best runners come from economically disadvantaged nations such as Jamaica and Kenya. Why was there no outrage at the dominance of Nordic peoples in the javelin toss or West Europeans in mountain biking? Blaming the plight of the have-nots on the bad intentions of the have-groups is widely applied to world economics, politics and education, but why not athletics?
The Olympics are not about creating a world where everyone is proficient or given an equal opportunity to win at every sport. When it’s not just about participating, it’s about competing to be the best in the world. And who is the best is not determined by what race or gender you are, or how free or controlled or wealthy your country is, but by a host of factors — none of which is necessarily fair. The best may come from the North or the South, by someone from a wealthy or a less affluent nation, from a very large or very small country, by someone with heritage from any of the world’s continents. When it comes down to it, nobody is equal to anybody else, and only the few can ever be the best.
No athlete declares his or her race, ethnicity or heritage. Nobody compiles statistics to prove which peoples suffered from unfair discrimination that must be rectified by race-based remedies on the part of Olympic committee or judges. No one is required to take a high-stakes test to meet a “high” standard of fitness or suffer the consequences. Now as John Lennon once sung, the Olympics can let us imagine a world or nation where we live in peace in harmony and can celebrate both the excellence of the few and the participation of the many, without hurting each other and arguing over who is to blame for some groups getting more than others.
Comments
2 Responses to “An Olympic Perspective on Diversity”
Got something to say?
So folks, why can’t we treat race in politics, economics and education like we do in the Olympics, and celebrate success, and pat people on the back for just showing up?
awarthur:
Please define, if you can that is, “success.”
And, after that, please explain how generalizations AND categories can be addressed, specifically, by wild and disparate claims and references and concatenations.
Better get back to reviewing old movies. Like “Breakfast at Poofany’s.”